4
122 * 123
× 1939 Ests. pp.
I
§ do.
Schedule]
© footnote to Schedule
end. to (1)
I End. 6 to 2)
on 53642/39 (Financial retions)
I
however, appears to be as
follows
Item & consists of two sub-items, (a) The Central Market (b) the Wholesale Market. It had previously been estimated that the former would cost $900,000 of which $184,687.50 was to be met out of the 1934 Loan and $115.: the future loan?
$115,312.50
out of
At that time the expenditure (a) was expected to be $699,846.77 ($) $14,900
Now, however,
in 1938 on
and on
§
The estimated cost of (a) has risen to $900,106.10.0 At the same time the extenditure in 1930 has thored out to be much less than was expected when the 1939 Estimates were
(a) having been $545,301.90 only a
($) $14,873.15+ Nothing
framed,
more will
That on
that on
(($2695) be spent on (3), the swings are transfered to (a).
Also, it has been possible to increase item 8 by $75, 411.75, by reducing other items correspondingly. It is therefore $50,000 # 115, 312,50) of cost against the futive loan, and the
proposed to charge only goo
rest against the 2934 one.
that is to say
$860,126.10 instead of $704, 687-50.
It would have saved a
great deal of
calculation and research if this had been explained in the dest, or On the Financial Sec. in his statement. I assume it is correct, as it fits in with the figures, but ? it might be as well, in approving the
resolutions, to say that the assumptions as set out above have been made,
As regards The "futwe loan" to which The Third resolution relates, and to which
[The
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.